The Mind, She Do Wander...

A few days back, the car radio had on a Chicago tune and I only heard snippets of it but when I got the chance I looked it up and played it: Make Me Smile

Children play in the park, they don't know
I'm alone in the dark, even though
Time and time again I see your face smiling inside

I'm so happy
That you love me
Life is lovely
When you're near me
Tell me you will stay
Make me smile

Go to YouTube or Spotify and play it. You will thank me.

This came out in 1970. The 1970's come in for a lot of well-deserved ragging due to, just about everything. But the music from that decade was phenomenal! Established bands like The Rolling Stones, The Who and Led Zeppelin came out with much of their best work--in the latter case, the vast majority of their total output was in that decade. Variety too: Steely Dan got started and put out at least 90% of their best work and punk got its start, which spawned new wave and alternative.

People often remember Chicago as the epitome of soft rock, which they arguably became--sometime in the 1980's. Anyway, if you listened to the song, like I suggested, you will hear heart and edge and trumpet. They are a trumpet playing band and they are rock and roll in 1970!


Which naturally made me think of Dire Straits:

And a crowd of young boys, they're fooling around in the corner,
Drunk and dressed in their best brown baggies and their platform soles.
They don't give a damn about any trumpet playing band.
It ain't what they call rock and roll.
And the Sultans,
Yes the Sultans play Creole.
Creole baby

Mark Knopfler was not thinking of Chicago when he wrote the song, but I can't help but think of them.

Added: There is an interesting dialectic going on in the Sultans of Swing On one hand, they are making fun of a dowdy jazz band with that name. But in the song, Knopfler sings in first person:

"We are the Sultans,
"We are the Sultans of Swing."

So, they are not rock and roll, but they are--because we hear Dire Straits playing. And yet they are a trumpet playing band but no trumpets are being played in the song.

Makes my head spin.

Twilight Of The Idols.

Every once in a while, you are watching when something historic happens: An unseeded player beats a living legend. It is tough, but inevitable. Maybe the younger player thinks, "could I have beaten him in his prime"? The veteran may be thinking along the same lines, but sucks it up and is gracious in defeat.

What to make then of the fiasco that was the Ladies US Open final?

Osaka gushed about how she loves Serena in the post-semi final interview. All her life, Ms. Williams was a legend. In the match, Osaka was better, she won the first set and was even in the 2nd. Then Serena had an epic melt down. It is one thing to see your idol defeated, age takes us all, but to see her act so classless. Wow!

This was no tennis god, she was all too Human.

Not in a good way!

I Am Not Okay With The Assault On Clear Communication

The thing is, I don't think it is an assault on debate per se. It is more of a, we want certain things and the fact that it harms clear communication does not matter.

Well, I am here to say it does matter. The term "homophobic" is a great example: It is a term that on the surface is used to stand in for anti-gay bigotry. And even if that is all it ever was, is still pretty bad. Bigotry and intolerance are moral failures not forms of mental illness! But of course, it has gone much, much further than that. It has become a way of calling whoever is against the latest thing--Don't ask don't tell, civil unions, gay marriage, trans-gender rights--a bigot. It is a weapon which stands in the way of making useful distinctions. To my way of thinking, anyone who uses the term unironically, is telegraphing that they are a simpleton and it is a waste of time debating them. Or, they are cynically using language as a cudgel rather than having to engage in the work of using reason to change minds.

There are lots of others:

Illegal Alien. A simple term, which means exactly what it says. We can't have that! It makes too clear, the distinction between legal aliens, like tourists, foreign students, legal resident aliens, etc. And people who came here without such permissions. The thing is, the replacement phrases are inexact mush. Undocumented Immigrant. The first word is wrong in a couple of ways. It assumes that they could have been documented and possibly will be and brushes-off the fact that they are in violation of the law. And second, maybe a lot of them are wanna-be immigrants but surely not all of them plan on staying for ever. Illegal alien makes no such assumptions--you are here illegally, we neither know nor care what your plans are

African American: Semi-Okay, but it does lead to hijinks when referring to say a black German or to a white person who immigrated from Africa to the US, etc. Otherwise, it is much like saying Italian-American. The thing is that most people don't use that kind of term once they are pretty far removed from the immigration. Both of my grandparents on my father's side,came from Italy. I sometimes say I'm half Italian, never Italian-American. Black Americans have been here significantly longer.

The okay hand-sign: I have to put my foot down. The okay sign meaning white power was a hoax--you can look it up. Now they are going to take away, what? One of the two or three hand signs that are not vulgar?

Added: And don't even get me started with how my kids (and presumably their coevals) use the word "literally". Suffice it to say, they use it in place of "figuratively". I acknowledge that this has become common, but reject its use on the grounds that there is no good substitute for "literally" which has the original meaning.