Thursday, December 04, 2025
Wednesday, December 03, 2025
Tuesday, December 02, 2025
Monday, December 01, 2025
Sunday, November 30, 2025
Saturday, November 29, 2025
Friday, November 28, 2025
Thursday, November 27, 2025
Wednesday, November 26, 2025
Tuesday, November 25, 2025
Monday, November 24, 2025
Sunday, November 23, 2025
Saturday, November 22, 2025
Friday, November 21, 2025
Thursday, November 20, 2025
Wednesday, November 19, 2025
Tuesday, November 18, 2025
Monday, November 17, 2025
Sunday, November 16, 2025
Saturday, November 15, 2025
Friday, November 14, 2025
Thursday, November 13, 2025
Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Tuesday, November 11, 2025
Monday, November 10, 2025
Sunday, November 09, 2025
Saturday, November 08, 2025
Friday, November 07, 2025
Thursday, November 06, 2025
Wednesday, November 05, 2025
Tuesday, November 04, 2025
Monday, November 03, 2025
Two Scary Movies
Weapons, (2025)
The premise is that all but one child from a classroom run-away one night. The teacher and the one remaining student are closely questioned and both claim to have no idea about what happened.
What I liked about it was that it was pretty scary--we were in for a horror film and while it wasn't the most frightened I've ever been, it was scary. In a deeper sense, it was an engaging story--not like the usual fare of a small and dwindling cadre of teens being chased-around and killed-off. It's a real story and the way it's told from different perspectives is artful. It has a great denouement and a satisfying ending.
Talk to Me (2022)
The premise is that there's this hand and you can hold it, like you're shaking hands but with your left hand. Then you say, "Talk to me", which makes contact with a spirit, then you say, "I let you in" which lets the spirit possess you. It has to be done as a group activity, because the contact needs to be broken by someone else, by prying the hand off of the possessed person.
The story revolves around a group of teens doing this for a thrill--which may be a sort of message on the danger of drugs. In addition, the teens like to video the events with their phones, so maybe a commentary on being excessively on-line.
Overall, pretty scary and well acted. The main drawback is that it was in Australian (English) but would have been just as comprehensible in German. Maybe if you watch it, put on subtitles. Another pesky thing was getting the aspect-ratio right. We normally keep ours on automatic and it was really off--to the point where we restarted the film. Then it was close and the stretch setting got it working perfectly--except for the afore-mentioned not understanding a word they said a lot of the time.
Sunday, November 02, 2025
Saturday, November 01, 2025
Friday, October 31, 2025
Thursday, October 30, 2025
Wednesday, October 29, 2025
Things Were Different in 1594
In case you were like, wow! Lesbianism was celebrated much earlier in history than I thought.
The painting portrays Gabrielle d'Estrées, mistress of King Henry IV of France, sitting in a bath, holding a ring. Her sister Julienne-Hyppolite-Joséphine sits beside her and pinches d'Estrées' right nipple.
Did sisters or women who were close, do a celebratory nipple pinch at news of pregnancy, or was the artist just being artsy? We will never know and I find that uncertainty more charming than a definite answer.
Tuesday, October 28, 2025
Monday, October 27, 2025
Sunday, October 26, 2025
Breaking The Law! Breaking The Law!
Well, not technically. Which can be simplified to just plain, no.
National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 (codified at 54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.)—there is a specific exemption for the White House, the Supreme Court building, and the U.S. Capitol (including their grounds and related buildings). This exemption applies to the Act's Section 106 review process (54 U.S.C. § 306108), which requires federal agencies to assess and mitigate potential adverse effects of construction, alteration, or demolition on historic properties before proceeding. These three structures are explicitly carved out to allow the executive, judicial, and legislative branches greater autonomy in managing their facilities.
Legal Basis: 54 U.S.C. § 307104 states: "Nothing in this division applies to the White House and its grounds, the Supreme Court building and its grounds, or the United States Capitol and its related buildings and grounds." This makes the NHPA's preservation requirements inapplicable to these sites, bypassing mandatory consultations with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, State Historic Preservation Officers, and public input.
Scope: The exemption covers construction, renovations, demolitions, and maintenance that could impact historic features. For example, recent White House East Wing demolition for a ballroom addition (October 2025) proceeded without Section 106 review, though voluntary submissions to bodies like the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) were made for transparency.
Rationale: Enacted amid post-WWII development concerns, the NHPA aimed to protect cultural landmarks, but these exemptions recognize the unique symbolic and operational needs of the three branches of government. Presidents and agencies often follow preservation best practices voluntarily (e.g., via the Secretary of the Interior's Standards) to maintain public trust.